Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., et al. No. 18-1233, amicus brief filed 09/20/2019.
September 20, 2019
ARLINGTON, VA. The American Intellectual Property Law Association today filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court today in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., et al. No. 18-1233, a case involving whether willful infringement is a prerequisite for a court to allow disgorgement of a defendant’s profits as a remedy for trademark infringement. The brief argues that proof of willfulness should not be required for an accounting of profits under Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act.
The Lanham Act provides for an accounting, or disgorgement, of the defendant’s profits, subject to the principles of equity, as one possible remedy for violating the Act. Congress has required a showing of the defendant’s willfulness for such relief under other types of Lanham Act claims, but not for the Section 43(a) claim at issue. The brief argues that requiring willfulness for an accounting of defendant’s profits violates the statute’s direction that the availability of such a remedy rests on the equities of each case. The brief explains that equitable principles underlying the accounting remedy do not necessarily require willfulness, and argues that courts should be free to grant that remedy based on the facts and circumstances of each case. According to AIPLA, willfulness is and should remain an important equitable factor in determining appropriate remedies for violations of the Act, but it should not be a threshold requirement for an accounting.
The Lanham Act provides for an accounting, or disgorgement, of the defendant’s profits, subject to the principles of equity, as one possible remedy for violating the Act. Congress has required a showing of the defendant’s willfulness for such relief under other types of Lanham Act claims, but not for the Section 43(a) claim at issue. The brief argues that requiring willfulness for an accounting of defendant’s profits violates the statute’s direction that the availability of such a remedy rests on the equities of each case. The brief explains that equitable principles underlying the accounting remedy do not necessarily require willfulness, and argues that courts should be free to grant that remedy based on the facts and circumstances of each case. According to AIPLA, willfulness is and should remain an important equitable factor in determining appropriate remedies for violations of the Act, but it should not be a threshold requirement for an accounting.
Upcoming Events
-
2025 Women in IP Law Global Networking Event
April 3, 2025
The annual Global Networking Event connects intellectual property practitioners from around the world for a day of networking, education, and creating meaningful connections. This year’s theme, Innovation and Collaboration, is an opportunity for the AIPLA Women in IP Law Committee to come together and discuss how women drive innovation and foster collaboration in their workplace. -
World IP Day 2025
April 30, 2025 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM
Join AIPLA and partner organizations on April 30 in Washington, DC, for a special three-hour program to celebrate World Intellectual Property Day 2025. This annual international event is an opportunity to learn about the role that intellectual property (IP) rights play in encouraging innovation and creativity. The theme of this year’s celebration is “IP and Music: Feel the Beat of IP.”