There are many differences between patent prosecution practice before the USPTO and patent prosecution practice before the EPO.  In many situations, the differences may be significant and thus may impact the patent application drafting and prosecution processes in the jurisdictions.  The differences and the reasons for the differences are often dynamic and can change rapidly.  Some of the differences are rooted in the dynamically changing patent law, others are rooted in the different patent prosecution standards.

This webinar provides a review of some of the differences between practice before the USPTO and before the EPO. It also attempts to provide some guidance to patent prosecutors to help them avoid some prosecution pitfalls in both jurisdictions.

In our Part 1 of 3 webinar, we discussed the differences in the US and the EP patent eligibility standards.  In this second part, we discuss the differences in determining claim definiteness, enablement and admissibility.  In our upcoming final part, we will discuss the differences in addressing anticipating rejections, obviousness-based rejections, and certain procedural differences in, for example, appeal proceedings and oral proceedings.

Presented by: Malgorzata (“Gosia”) Kulczycka of Hickman Palermo Becker Bingham LLP; Eric-Michael Dokter of Viering, Jentschura & Partner mbB.

---

 

In response to Covid-19, AIPLA has put in-place a new process for Multiple Attendee Site registrations that allows each site registrant to participate in the webinar independently.

Special rate for AIPLA SOLO PRACTICE/SMALL FIRM MEMBERS:  $65
Special rate for AIPLA STUDENT MEMBERS:  $10

Registration includes:

• For multiple-attendee sites, each registered participant will receive individual logins due to Covid-19 social distancing requirements.
• CLE certification/processing for applicable states.  Reference CLE Information below for complete details.  
• Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information, accessible 24-48 hours before webinar date.

Cancellation Policy:

To get full refund, registrant must request refund five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product. 

System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.

CLE INFORMATION 

AIPLA is a pre-approved CLE provider with the following states:

• Alaska
• California
• New Hampshire
• New Mexico
• New York
• Pennsylvania
• Vermont

AIPLA has applied for CLE accreditation in the following states: 

CLE Restrictions: 

ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah

These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit.  Multiple attendees prohibited.

ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona

Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.

ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire

New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53.  The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting NH CLE credit after the webinar.   

 Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.

• Outlook,
• ICal,
• Google Calendar