Quarterly Journal Volume 51, Issue 2 September 2023

Please sign in to view the articles. Once you've signed in please refresh the page to see the download link. 
The AIPLA Quarterly Journal, a publication of the American Intellectual Property Law Association, is housed at the George Washington University Law School and is edited and managed by an Editorial Board of intellectual property experts and a staff of law students under the direction of the Editor-in-Chief, Professor Joan Schaffner.

The Quarterly Journal is dedicated to presenting materials relating to intellectual property matters and is published four times per year. Editorial Board members (all of whom are lawyers) are selected based upon demonstrated interest and experience, and student staff members are selected from the students of the GWU Law School.
QJ 51.2 - Compacting Prosecution and Petitions at the USTPO: Incredibly Useful and Incredibly Frustrating

Ryan Pool

COMPACTING PROSECUTION AND PETITIONS AT THE USPTO: INCREDIBLY USEFUL AND INCREDIBLY FRUSTRATING

Petitions for an incomplete Office Action can be an efficient and effective tool for applicants to compact prosecution before the USPTO by ensuring that Examiners uphold their duty to progress prosecution on every issue preventing allowance. However, the USPTO’s failure to timely process these petitions jeopardizes the system, lowers patent quality, and cost applicants money. This paper explains how the system works and how it doesn’t.
QJ 51.2 - Architects, Artists, Photographers, Property Owners, the Public and Their Rights: Reconciling VARA, the AWCPA, and Copyright Fundamentals

David Shipley

ARCHITECTS, ARTISTS, PHOTOGRAPHERS, PROPERTY OWNERS, THE PUBLIC, AND THEIR RIGHTS: RECONCILING VARA, THE AWCPA, AND COPYRIGHT FUNDAMENTALS

Congress expanded the rights of architects and visual artists in 1990 when it enacted the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (AWCPA) and the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA). However, after more than three decades there are still several questions about the relationship between VARA, the AWCPA, and the rest of the Copyright Act. One question concerns a visual artist’s rights against unauthorized photographs or other pictorial representations of a building that incorporates the artist’s work, such as a mural or a sculptural work. Does the photograph infringe the artists’ rights in that work or is it exempted? Another question concerns a visual artist’s rights in a work incorporated in a building when the owner of the building wants to remodel or demolish the structure. If the work of visual art is of recognized stature, can the artist insist on removing the work or recover damages if the building owner destroys it during the demolition or remodeling? There is relatively recent litigation involving photographs of artists’ murals on buildings that were posted on websites, sketches or diagrams of architects’ plans that were posted on websites, and the deliberate whitewashing of acclaimed street art that had been sprayed on a dilapidated warehouse. These cases have required courts to interpret and apply VARA, the AWCPA and the Copyright Act to resolve several challenging questions. This article explains and reconciles the results in these cases, and recommends a way to interpret provisions in VARA and the AWCPA to accommodate the rights and interests of artists, architects, photographers, building owners and the general public.
QJ 51.2 - What is Really in the Best Interest of Baseball?: How Declining Public Trust in America’s Pastime Can Be the Catalyst for Federal Intellectual Property Legislation

Alyssa Karfinkel

WHAT IS REALLY IN THE BEST INTEREST OF BASEBALL?: HOW DECLINING PUBLIC TRUST IN AMERICA'S PASTIME CAN BE THE CATALYST FOR FEDERAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEGISLATION

During the 2017 and 2018 Major League Baseball seasons, the Houston Astros orchestrated a sign stealing operation that ultimately led to its World Series win. The punishments imposed by the Commissioner of Baseball were doled out arbitrarily, leaving fans, players, and the media dissatisfied and angry. This Note argues that the plenary power held by the Commissioner is harmful to the game of baseball, and proposes federal legislation to protect signs from improper misappropriation, drawing heavily on trade secret law.
QJ 51.2 - Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: Providing Free Public Access of Copyrighted Standards Incorporated by Reference into Law Through Compulsory Licensing

Zoie Mestayer

HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT TOO: PROVIDING FREE PUBLIC ACCESS OF COPYRIGHTED STANDARDS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO LAW THROUGH COMPULSORY LICENSING

Incorporation by reference is a common practice in rulemaking where federal agencies make a rule that cites standards owned and developed by private organizations. These standards appear only in name and citation in the final regulation but nonetheless have legal effect as if they were fully included in the rule. Even though these standards constitute a binding piece of law, standards developing organizations (“SDOs”) retain copyright ownership of these standards,
allowing them to charge a fee in exchange for access to the full standard. Many SDOs have provided free read-only access to certain incorporated standards on their websites, but this practice is voluntary and often inconsistent. Regardless of the efforts of SDOs to make these standards accessible, the incorporating agencies should provide free online access to satisfy due process and the First Amendment. Free online access would also comport with fundamental
principles of equity, fairness, and efficiency. The proposed compulsory licensing regime would require agencies to provide this free online access while respecting the copyright interests of SDOs and incentivizing them to continue developing industry standards.
QJ 51.2 - The Need to Adopt Blockchain in the Intellectual Property Field and How to Do It

Grant Pincock

THE NEED TO ADOPT BLOCKCHAIN IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FIELD AND HOW TO DO IT

Implementation of blockchain technology needs to occur within the field of intellectual property. To properly implement blockchain technology, parties must understand the purpose of the blockchain, determine whether to develop a new platform or leverage an existing platform, select a consensus protocol, initialize the platform, and establish a community of trust. This note discusses how to implement a blockchain system. It presents a detailed understanding of blockchain with a discussion of the nuances therein. This note concludes with how blockchain can solve current issues within the intellectual property field through the use of decentralized applications (dApps), smart contracts, and tokenization.
Knobbe Martens

Upcoming Events

  • AIPLA Committee Webinar: Israel’s Innovation Blueprint: From Idea to Impact

    November 12, 2025 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM   |   No CLE

    FREE for AIPLA Members! Join us for a unique opportunity to hear directly from two of Israel’s leading voices in innovation and intellectual property at the upcoming AIPLA webinar, “Israel’s Innovation Blueprint: From Idea to Impact.” Mordechay (Moti) Sorek, Director of the Israel Patent Office, will highlight the remarkable growth of the Israel Patent Office and its recognition as an International Searching Authority for PCT applications - an achievement that underscores Israel’s increasing role in the global IP landscape. Zafrir Neuman, Chief Legal Officer of the Israel Innovation Authority, will provide insights into the Authority’s pivotal role in shaping Israel’s dynamic start-up ecosystem and advancing its reputation as the “Start-Up Nation.” Don’t miss this inside look at how Israel translates ideas into global impact.
  • AIPLA CLE Webinar: Preparing Patent Specifications for AI Inventions - US, Europe and UK and Possible Consequences

    December 2, 2025 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM   |   Eligible for up to 90 Mins CLE

    What does recent case law tell us about subject matter eligibility? What about sufficiency? How open is the USPTO’s more “open door”? At the USPTO, August’s memorandum “Reminders on evaluating subject matter eligibility of claims under 35 U.S.C. 101” was closely followed by Director Squires’ Appeal Review Panel decision (Desjardins) overturning a PTAB §101 rejection and stating that §§102, 103 and 112 are the important criteria for determining AI patentability. Where does this leave us? In Europe and in the US, what does case law tell us about sufficiency and best drafting practice? We will also try and explore possible consequences of these drafting practices on subsequent disputes.
  • 2026 AIPLA Virtual Corporate Practice Institute

    January 13 to 20, 2026   |   Up to 360 Minutes of CLE

    The Corporate Practice Institute is not a bootcamp. This program provides in-depth insight for in-house corporate counsel and agents to learn about wide ranging legal issues affecting their practice from experienced practitioners. It is designed for experienced in-house attorneys and new in-house attorneys learning to manage new corporate environments and challenges not taught in law schools or private practice. The Institute also helps private practice attorneys, especially associates, prepare for potential in-house career moves. The program also provides valuable networking opportunities to connect with each other and learn from each other's experiences. This online, CLE-program spans two half-days, from Noon – 5:00 pm Eastern and includes 3 one-hour education sessions and a networking session each day.
  • 2026 IP Transactions Bootcamp

    February 12, 2026

    This in-person-only bootcamp is designed to provide practical insights and strategies for professionals working in intellectual property transactions. The day features a comprehensive agenda including: Panels and CLE Sessions: Learn about Working with Tech Transfer Offices, Strategies for successful collaborations between nonprofits and industry, and Protecting and monetizing an AI asset. Drafting and Negotiating Tips: Get practical advice on drafting and negotiating strategic collaboration and license agreements. Hands-on Workshop: Participate in a Mock licensing negotiation to put your skills to the test. Networking: Conclude the day with a dedicated Networking reception. Registration Coming Soon!
  • 2026 Trade Secret Summit

    March 26 to 27, 2026

    The AIPLA Trade Secret Summit is the leading trade secret conference in the nation, with speakers from across the spectrum of private practitioners, in-house counsel, government, and academia, as well as fantastic networking opportunities. CLE credits will be available.