News
In This Section
-
PTAB Designates Three Decisions as Precedential
April 19, 2019
The USPTO on April 16, 2019, designated three PTAB decisions as precedential. -
Supreme Court Hears Argument on Constitutionality of Scandalous Trademark Ban
April 17, 2019
The Supreme Court on April 15, 2019, heard oral argument in the Brunetti case on whether the statutory ban on registering “immoral ... or scandalous” trademarks violates the First Amendment. Iancu v. Brunetti, U.S., No. 18-302, oral argument 4/15/2019. -
USPTO to Host Free Seminars on Protecting IP in China
April 15, 2019
The US Patent and Trademark Office will begin hosting free seminars on protecting your IP in China. The new series of road shows will be geared towards businesses, individuals, and attorneys looking to hear about strategies for better protecting intellectual property in China. -
Ohio State Loses Trademark Infringement Suit Against Redbubble
April 12, 2019
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on April 1, 2019, held that Redbubble, Inc. was not liable for direct infringement of several of Ohio State University’s trademarks. The Ohio State Univ. v. Redbubble Inc., S.D. Ohio, No. 17-cv-1092, 3/29/19. -
Website Lacking Ordering Details Fails Use-in-Commerce Test
April 11, 2019
A website for goods that lacks any ordering information such as cost, payment options, minimum quantities, and shipping information is insufficient proof of the goods’ use in commerce when applying for trademark registration, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held on April 10, 2019. In Re: Siny Corp., Fed. Cir., No. 2018-1077, 1/14/19. -
CAFC Orders New Trial in Remote Vehicle Control Case
April 10, 2019
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on April 8, 2019, upheld the validity of Omega Patents, LLC’s remote vehicle control patents, but, ordered a new trial on whether Cal Amp Corp. induced infringement. Omega Patents, LLC v. CalAmp Corp., Fed. Cir., No. 2018-1309, 4/8/19. -
PTAB Designates Huawei Decision as Precedential
April 9, 2019
The PTAB on April 5, 2019, designated as precedential Huawei Device Co., Ltd. v. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, Case IPR2018-00816 (PTAB Jan. 8, 2019) (Paper 19). The decision provides guidance as to the procedure for submitting new evidence with a rehearing request and explains that a party must show good cause for submitting new evidence. -
USPTO “Motion to Amend” Patent Quality Chat
April 8, 2019
The United States Patent & Trademark Office will host its next Patent Quality Chat webinar, entitled “New pilot program for motions to amend in AIA trial proceedings,” which will be broadcast on April 9, from noon to 1 p.m. ET. -
Sovereign Immunity Bars Copyright Suit Against Hospital
April 5, 2019
Sovereign immunity bars a federal copyright infringement claim against a public hospital, the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled on March 7, 2019. -
Cleveland Clinic Heart Disease Patent Invalid
April 4, 2019
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on April 1, 2019, held the Cleveland Clinic Foundation’s heart disease detection patent invalid because the claims of the patent were directed to a natural law and recited no other inventive concept. -
Kroma EU Has No Standing to Sue Kardashian Sisters
April 3, 2019
The Eleventh Circuit on April 1, 2019, held that Kroma EU, a European cosmetics company, lacked standing to sue the Kardashian sisters for trademark infringement in the US. -
Federal Circuit Reverses IBM Patent Invalidation
April 2, 2019
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on April 1, 2019, held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must reconsider its decision to invalidate IBM’s U.S. Patent No. 7,631,346; the patent is related to a system for reducing authentication burdens by allowing a user to sign-in only once while accessing multiple applications. -
Brexit and the European Patent System
April 1, 2019
The UK is due to leave the European Union – an economic and political partnership of 28 countries – ending 46 years of British membership. But the exact timing remains unclear. -
5th Circuit Declines to Disgorge Profits in False Advertising Suit
April 1, 2019
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on March 26, 2019, affirmed a district court ruling which declined to disgorge Becton Dickinson & Co.’s (BD) profits despite the fact the syringe maker was found liable by a jury on multiple Lanham Act violations. -
Karyn A. Temple Is Named Register of Copyrights
March 29, 2019
Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden announced that she has appointed Karyn A. Temple as Register of Copyrights and director of the U.S. Copyright Office, effective March 27, 2019. Temple has been Acting Register of Copyrights since October 21, 2016. -
USPTO Alerts Users on EFS-Web System Issue
March 28, 2019
The US Patent and Trademark Office on March 27, 2019, alerted EFS-Web users about a system defect in the initial web-based application data sheet (ADS) and the corrected web-based ADS. -
Arctic Cat Invalidated Patent Sent Back to PTAB
March 27, 2019
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on March 26, 2019, held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board wrongly invalidated an Arctic Cat Inc. patent based on an earlier-filed application. -
Developing the Digital Marketplace for Copyrighted Works Public Meeting
March 26, 2019
On March 28, the Department of Commerce’s Internet Policy Task Force will host the third public meeting on Developing the Digital Marketplace for Copyrighted Works at the USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. -
Director Iancu Appears Before Senate Judiciary Committee
March 20, 2019
USPTO Director Andrei Iancu on March 13, 2019, appeared at an oversight hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee. -
Apple’s IPR Victory in Data Patent Challenge Overturned by CAFC
March 20, 2019
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on March 8, 2019, overturned Apple Inc.’s IPR victory against PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, holding that the ‘310 patent was not unpatentable due to obviousness because one of the PTAB’s key underlying fact findings was not supported by substantial evidence.